The
Case of the Creepy Scope
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Helpful Instructional Design Links
This
site specifically addresses budgeting in an instructional design project. The
author breaks down the process using a specific example, but also offers the
average development time for multiple types of design projects and estimations
for the amount of time it takes for instructor preparation, offering valuable
guidance for beginners such as myself. I recently started my own social media
and instructional design consulting company and one of my struggles has been
determining pricing; this site is an invaluable source and will help me
determine my pricing.
This
site offers an overview of the instructional design project management process,
detailing the potential pitfalls and trials that designers may run into
throughout the design process. It is a brief, but concise site that focuses on
speeding up the design process while minimizing errors and improving
efficiency. These tips can be used to help both novice and veteran designers
streamline their design process; it is especially helpful for those, like
myself, that have no process as of yet.Thursday, January 24, 2013
The Art of Effective Communication: Interpretations
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Post Mortem Of A Failed Project
I took on a household project in 2008 that, in retrospect, should have been left to professionals. I decided to build my own custom home theater in the basement of my home in Atlanta. I had a rectangular shaped 30 x 14 foot room in which I wanted to build a three level platform in order to simulate stadium seating for watching movies and entertaining guests. I performed my “research” by looking through multiple home theater magazines and web sites. I was on vacation and planned to begin and complete the project in 13 days (the amount of time that I had left before returning to work).
Unfortunately
the project was a complete and utter failure. If I had any knowledge of the
project management process (or common sense) I would have been a lot more
thorough during the planning phase of the project, make sure that my research
was more thorough. If I had performed a feasibility study I would have realized
several things:
·
I did not possess the carpentry skills that were required to
complete this project
·
I did not own some of the required tools
needed to complete this project
·
I did not even attempt to set a budget for
the project, thinking that whatever money that I spent would pay for itself in
the end.
·
I did not research the design
specifications for the type of platform that I was building
Sunday, December 23, 2012
The Future of Distance Learning
What do you think the perceptions of distance learning will be in the
future (in 5–10 years; 10–20 years)
In the fall of
2005 I enrolled in a brick and mortar M.S. program in order to advance my teaching
career and, of course, my salary. I had previously enrolled in the same program
the prior fall, but was forced to withdraw because of a back injury sustained
in a car accident. When I was finally able to begin the program, I was
hard-pressed to earn my degree as quickly as possible, as a promotion was all
but guaranteed to me. My graduate enrollment advisor informed me that I had the
choice of taking the majority of my classes either face-to-face or online. I
had never taken an online class before; additionally, every educated person
that I knew would make light of online courses, usually poking fun at
commercials from schools like the University of Phoenix. I was quite reluctant
to sign up for any of the online courses, fearing that I would not receive that
same quality of instruction that I would receive in the brick and mortar
classes. This attitude was not uncommon among the general populace for the
majority of the next decade.
Today, things are
quite different. A decade later, people’s attitudes have changed immensely
towards distance learning, particularly with full time professional adults that
do not have the time or scheduling flexibility of a younger person. Due to the
fact that I am a public school teacher, I am surrounded by professionals that
can only get a significant pay raise by attending graduate school. I found that
a lot of teachers spend much of their adult lives in graduate school in an
attempt to improve their quality of life and. This has led to a large number of
adults that don’t have any choice but to enroll in a distance learning program.
What I have noticed in my profession is that over time there has been a gradual
change that went from teachers justifying their choice to attend an online
program, almost ashamedly, to the present where we routinely discuss the rigor
of our programs and often express shock and awe when we encounter a graduate
student that has chosen to attend brick and mortar classes.
The Instructional
Design program that Walden offers is a completely different experience than the
online courses that I participated in almost a decade ago. Programs such as
Walden’s show that while not perfected, distance learning has seen a
significant amount of refinements, making it my personal choice for graduate
education. Due to both the rapid growth and change in perception of distance
learning I can only surmise that the field will continue to grow in both quality
and scope. I also believe that distance learning will become an integral part
of undergraduate and high school education. I don’t think that it is too
far-fetched to see a teen parent at home with their new born engaged in a
remote course instead of missing out on valuable educational time. Also, with
the rapid increase in mobile technology, it is almost assured that the “instant
gratification” populace that is currently emerging will also demand to have their
education a la carte; tools such as the iPad will most likely play an integral
role in the growth of distance education.
How can you as an instructional designer be a proponent for improving
societal perceptions of distance learning?
How will you be a positive force for continuous improvement in the
field of distance education?
I recently applied
for an Instructional Design position at a well-established company in my local
area. One of the most attractive aspects of this company is the fact that
employees are encouraged to continually educate themselves and attempt to innovate
when designing courses. While fulfilling a contract is always the primary goal,
employees are given the liberty to try new approaches and strategies. In a
position such as this, I would most definitely use the opportunity to find and
implement new ways to engage learners and improve the current methods of transferring
knowledge remotely. The key to accomplishing this would most definitely lay in
time spent performing research, as well as studying the research of others.
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Saturday, December 1, 2012
A
growing segment of distance learning is Open Course web sites. These are free
sites in which individuals can view courses that range in subject matter. These
sites generally do not require registration, but in turn, they do not offer
credit or certification of any kind. I have chosen to examine a Stanford Law
School course focusing on the bias of beauty that is prevalent in business
practices. This particular course is offered in a video lecture format, lastly
approximately one hour. This course is accessible via iTunes and can be
retrieved from http://itunes.stanford.edu/.
It
was quite obvious that this course was not tailored towards a true distance
learning environment. The list of course attributes that are conducive to
distance learning is quite short:
·
Accessibility: The Stanford courses are
readily available on iTunes, making them accessible to just about anyone that
owns a computer with internet access
·
Low Tech Equipment Demands: Participants
do not need items such as scanners, cameras or microphones
·
Asynchronous Courses: Learners can
participates in Stanford courses any time of day, stopping and starting as
desired
These are in accordance
with teachings of Dr. George Piskurich in which he emphasizes the importance of
considering the learners access to technology (Piskurich, 2012) and similar
emphasis stated in our course text (Simonson et al., 2012).
The
shortcomings of Stanford Open Course offerings, in my opinion, are quite
numerous:
·
There are no visual aids to assist with
information transfer
·
There is an absence of interactivity
·
Collaboration between learners is not an
option
·
No Consideration of Audience
With
the complete absence of some of the core design principles that should be
included in distance learning planning, I believe that it is more than obvious
that remotely follow the recommendations listed in our text. As I watched the
Open Course it felt no different from watching a video on YouTube. There was no
interactivity during the course and there were no optional follow up activities
provided for the distance learners’ enrichment. The absence of any sort of
assignments whatsoever left me feeling more entertained than educated, which is
not the purpose of a program such as this. While this type of distance module
has it’s uses and does contain excellent information, I am not sure if it
warrants the label of “course” in anything but the most loose of definitions.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
"A new automated staff information system was recently purchased by a major corporation and needs to be implemented in six regional offices. Unfortunately, the staff is located throughout all the different offices and cannot meet at the same time or in the same location. As an instructional designer for the corporation, you have been charged with implementing a training workshop for these offices. As part of the training, you were advised how imperative it is that the staff members share information, in the form of screen captures and documents, and participate in ongoing collaboration."
When
creating a distance learning module, assessing the use of technology is an
essential component of the planning process (Simonson et. al, 2012). Although
cloud computing has been around in some form for the better part of a decade,
it is only recently becoming a widely recognized as a viable tool for not only
document sharing, but collaboration in its’ truest form; this is a benefit for
designers as it alleviates one of the most critical hurdles in distance
learning. The major hurdle that designers face when implementing the use of one
of these applications is the uninitiated that may resist change. In order to
best address the needs, there are two performance tasks that need to be
addressed: information sharing and ongoing collaboration. There are a variety
of options to address these needs that range in price and complexity. The key
is to find an effective low-cost option that is not too complicated for the
average worker to master in an acceptable time frame.
The
Senior Instructional Designer at the University of Alabama has successfully
integrated Google Docs into both online course development and professional
development for the faculty, stating that Google Docs serves to eliminate the
difficulties of collaborating across great distances and multiple time
zones. Additionally, a team of Florida
State University professors researched the benefits of using Google Docs for
distance learning and presented their findings at the Columbia State University
Learning “Now “ Frontier Conference. Their presentation was called Google Docs:
A Robust Hub for Online Collaboration; in this presentation they emphasized the
affordability, wide compatibility and robust online capabilities. Google Docs
addresses one of the major concerns of distance education practitioners, the
amount of interactivity/collaboration that is possible in a course (Beldarrain,
2006), is appropriately addressed and should be sufficient for most
collaborative scenarios over distance.
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











