The Art of Effective Communication: Interpretations
This exercise proved to
be quite interesting; the written message seemed to be extremely wordy and came across as timid. The message felt as if the writer was almost afraid of being a
nuisance or pest. The voice-mail was an entirely different story; it started off
with the same tone of timidity, but quickly became assertive and borderline
demanding. The speaker’s voice emphasized the importance of the report data
that was needed. The face-to-face video seemed to take a step backwards; it did
not give off the same feeling of timidity as the written notice, but it did not
seem as assertive as the voice-mail The speaker’s body language and ending
smile lacked assertiveness as well, making the request seem less important.
This
exercise is attempting to illustrate the importance of communicating with your
team members in the appropriate manner for the appropriate situation. When
dealing with many different people that each have potentially different
personalities (and work ethics). It is imperative that, as a project manager or
instructional designer, you communicate both clearly and effectively so that
your team can operate smoothly. It is especially important in a case such as
this, in which a deadline is in danger of being missed; one cannot afford for a
team member to misinterpret the level of urgency of the requested task. This
could be the difference between success and failure. When I take on either of
these rolls I will have to make a conscious effort to maintain a clear and
concise line of communication with my team members, especially in relation to meeting
deadlines on project deliverables.