Sunday, December 23, 2012


The Future of Distance Learning 
 
What do you think the perceptions of distance learning will be in the future (in 5–10 years; 10–20 years)
In the fall of 2005 I enrolled in a brick and mortar M.S. program in order to advance my teaching career and, of course, my salary. I had previously enrolled in the same program the prior fall, but was forced to withdraw because of a back injury sustained in a car accident. When I was finally able to begin the program, I was hard-pressed to earn my degree as quickly as possible, as a promotion was all but guaranteed to me. My graduate enrollment advisor informed me that I had the choice of taking the majority of my classes either face-to-face or online. I had never taken an online class before; additionally, every educated person that I knew would make light of online courses, usually poking fun at commercials from schools like the University of Phoenix. I was quite reluctant to sign up for any of the online courses, fearing that I would not receive that same quality of instruction that I would receive in the brick and mortar classes. This attitude was not uncommon among the general populace for the majority of the next decade.
Today, things are quite different. A decade later, people’s attitudes have changed immensely towards distance learning, particularly with full time professional adults that do not have the time or scheduling flexibility of a younger person. Due to the fact that I am a public school teacher, I am surrounded by professionals that can only get a significant pay raise by attending graduate school. I found that a lot of teachers spend much of their adult lives in graduate school in an attempt to improve their quality of life and. This has led to a large number of adults that don’t have any choice but to enroll in a distance learning program. What I have noticed in my profession is that over time there has been a gradual change that went from teachers justifying their choice to attend an online program, almost ashamedly, to the present where we routinely discuss the rigor of our programs and often express shock and awe when we encounter a graduate student that has chosen to attend brick and mortar classes.
 
The Instructional Design program that Walden offers is a completely different experience than the online courses that I participated in almost a decade ago. Programs such as Walden’s show that while not perfected, distance learning has seen a significant amount of refinements, making it my personal choice for graduate education. Due to both the rapid growth and change in perception of distance learning I can only surmise that the field will continue to grow in both quality and scope. I also believe that distance learning will become an integral part of undergraduate and high school education. I don’t think that it is too far-fetched to see a teen parent at home with their new born engaged in a remote course instead of missing out on valuable educational time. Also, with the rapid increase in mobile technology, it is almost assured that the “instant gratification” populace that is currently emerging will also demand to have their education a la carte; tools such as the iPad will most likely play an integral role in the growth of distance education.
How can you as an instructional designer be a proponent for improving societal perceptions of distance learning?
As an instructional designer it is my responsibility to show learners that distance learning is not only a credible form of education, but in some cases, a superior one. What it all comes down to is the fundamental building blocks of education: effectiveness and validity. As a designer of distance courses it will be my responsibility to design courses that are engaging, informative, enlightening, challenging, and effective. I feel that one of the reasons that online learning still suffers from a negative perception is partially due to course designers that “phone it in” or so to speak. If a course designer takes the path of least resistance and makes the minimal effort when designing courses, it will be apparent to the learner, as well as clients. As an Instructional Designer I must strive to make every course an experience that each learner would love to return to.
How will you be a positive force for continuous improvement in the field of distance education?
I recently applied for an Instructional Design position at a well-established company in my local area. One of the most attractive aspects of this company is the fact that employees are encouraged to continually educate themselves and attempt to innovate when designing courses. While fulfilling a contract is always the primary goal, employees are given the liberty to try new approaches and strategies. In a position such as this, I would most definitely use the opportunity to find and implement new ways to engage learners and improve the current methods of transferring knowledge remotely. The key to accomplishing this would most definitely lay in time spent performing research, as well as studying the research of others.

Saturday, December 1, 2012


A growing segment of distance learning is Open Course web sites. These are free sites in which individuals can view courses that range in subject matter. These sites generally do not require registration, but in turn, they do not offer credit or certification of any kind. I have chosen to examine a Stanford Law School course focusing on the bias of beauty that is prevalent in business practices. This particular course is offered in a video lecture format, lastly approximately one hour. This course is accessible via iTunes and can be retrieved from http://itunes.stanford.edu/.
As Stanford is one of the most respected academic institutions in the United States, if not the world, I had high expectations when I began this Open Course. Despite the fact that it was a free offering, I expected it to at least resemble an actual course from mainstream academia. It did not; what I was greeted with was an hour long video of a class lecture with more faults than merits. Admittedly, the subject matter offered in this course was quite interesting, if not entertaining, but it was more than obvious that this was not designed to provide a learning experience, but more of an opportunity for those participating to become more enlightened and perhaps encouraged to seek more knowledge on their own.
It was quite obvious that this course was not tailored towards a true distance learning environment. The list of course attributes that are conducive to distance learning is quite short:
·         Accessibility: The Stanford courses are readily available on iTunes, making them accessible to just about anyone that owns a computer with internet access
·         Low Tech Equipment Demands: Participants do not need items such as scanners, cameras or microphones
·         Asynchronous Courses: Learners can participates in Stanford courses any time of day, stopping and starting as desired
These are in accordance with teachings of Dr. George Piskurich in which he emphasizes the importance of considering the learners access to technology (Piskurich, 2012) and similar emphasis stated in our course text (Simonson et al., 2012).
The shortcomings of Stanford Open Course offerings, in my opinion, are quite numerous:
·         There are no visual aids to assist with information transfer
·         There is an absence of interactivity
·         Collaboration between learners is not an option
·         No Consideration of Audience
With the complete absence of some of the core design principles that should be included in distance learning planning, I believe that it is more than obvious that remotely follow the recommendations listed in our text. As I watched the Open Course it felt no different from watching a video on YouTube. There was no interactivity during the course and there were no optional follow up activities provided for the distance learners’ enrichment. The absence of any sort of assignments whatsoever left me feeling more entertained than educated, which is not the purpose of a program such as this. While this type of distance module has it’s uses and does contain excellent information, I am not sure if it warrants the label of “course” in anything but the most loose of definitions.